Fall Academic PD Day 🍁 Our Next Academic PD Day is happening October 29, 2026 Join us Thursday, October 29 for Fall Academic PD Day. We are excited to continue exploring the Braiding Learning Framework, continuing with the third ring: Mindful Learning. Come out for a morning of exploring strength-based approaches to creating engaging content in your classes! We hope to see you there! Event details Fall Academic PD Day 🍁 Date: Thursday, October 29, 2026 Time: 9 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. Location: Centre for Collaborative Education (CFCE) Join us for Fall Academic PD Day Hurry! Registration closes Tuesday, October 27, 2026. Register now Registration is NOW closed Thank you for your interest. While we are at capacity for our keynote and workshop sessions, non-registered attendees are welcome to join any of the breakout sessions available. See you on April 24! Call for Proposals Are you using interesting approaches to curriculum in your classes? Submit a proposal to share your approaches with other faculty and staff. We are also open to accepting sessions that highlight general teaching, learning and assessment practices at DC. Individual and/or joint (interdisciplinary and cross-departmental) session(s) will be considered. When completing your proposal, you will be asked to submit a title, short session description and names of co-presenters (if applicable). The session description you provide will be used in CTL promotional materials for the event, including the CTL Compass. Be A part of Academic PD Day! Proposals will be accepted until October 16, 2026. Submit a Proposal Be A part of Academic PD Day! Interested? Proposals will be accepted until October 16, 2026. Submit a proposal Keynote Spotlight This year’s theme is mindful learning, aligned with the Braiding Learning Framework. We are excited to announce our keynote speaker, Professor Fiona Rawle from the University of Toronto Mississauga. About Professor Fiona Rawle Fiona Rawle has a Ph.D in Pathology and Molecular Medicine and is a Professor, Teaching Stream, in the Dept. of Biology at the University of Toronto Mississauga. Her research focuses on learning from failure, bias in STEM, science misinformation, the science of learning, and public communication of science. She has received numerous awards focused on teaching, including the 3M National Teaching Fellowship. Dr. Rawle is the Director of Operations for the Toronto Initiative for Diversity & Excellence, through which she gives lectures and workshops on unconscious bias, equity, and diversity. Professor Fiona Rawle will be facilitating the opening keynote during Fall Academic PD Day: The Science of Learning from Failure: Practical Strategies for Teachers and Students Learning from failure is a core component of education, however it is not often deliberately taught in secondary and college courses. There has been a dramatic increase in advice to “fail forward” and “fail fast”, however the corresponding structural and sustained supports are sometimes lacking. In this interactive session we will dive into the science of learning and explore what we know (and what we don't know) about how to support students in learning through failure, including how to help students have agency in the learning process. We'll look at innovative strategies for teaching students to embrace, learn from, and bounce back from failure in multi-disciplinary contexts, from pre-university to technical programs. We’ll also look at threshold concepts and misconceptions, and why learning from failure is key to comprehension and building knowledge - especially in the GenAI landscape and particularly as students navigate the transition into college, university and the workforce. Schedule Last updated: October 19, 2026 at 2:49 p.m. 🌎 Global Classroom 🪺 FPIC 1️⃣ CFCE 116 2️⃣ CFCE 117 3️⃣ CFCE 118 🌎 Global Classroom 1️⃣ CFCE 116 2️⃣ CFCE 117 3️⃣ CFCE 118 [ 🌎 Global Classroom ][ 🪺 FPIC ] [ 1️⃣ CFCE 116 ][ 1️⃣ CFCE 116 ][ 3️⃣ CFCE 118 ] TIME SESSION 8:30 a.m. Registration & Light Breakfast 9 a.m. 🌎 Welcome & Land Acknowledgement Barbara MacCheyne & Amanda Maknyik 9:15 a.m. Morning Keynote / 🌎 The Science of Learning from Failure: Practical Strategies for Teachers and Students with Dr. Fiona Rawle Learning from failure is a core component of education, however it is not often deliberately taught in secondary and college courses. There has been a dramatic increase in advice to “fail forward” and “fail fast”, however the corresponding structural and sustained supports are sometimes lacking. In this interactive session we will dive into the science of learning and explore what we know (and what we don't know) about how to support students in learning through failure, including how to help students have agency in the learning process. We'll look at innovative strategies for teaching students to embrace, learn from, and bounce back from failure in multi-disciplinary contexts, from pre-university to technical programs. We’ll also look at threshold concepts and misconceptions, and why learning from failure is key to comprehension and building knowledge - especially in the GenAI landscape and particularly as students navigate the transition into college, university and the workforce. 10:45 a.m. Break 11 a.m. Breakout Sessions 1️⃣ Are You on the Bus? Keeping Every Learner Engaged and Moving Forward with Leah Zakojc Every student enters the learning environment with different experiences, abilities, and levels of confidence. How do we ensure everyone stays engaged, feels comfortable asking questions, and has the opportunity to succeed? Through an engaging and interactive session, participants will explore practical, strength-based teaching strategies that support instructional pacing, communication, and student confidence. Drawing on real classroom experiences, including the memorable "Are You on the Bus?" metaphor, this session demonstrates how simple adjustments to instructional delivery can help learners recognize when they've missed a step, ask for clarification without embarrassment, and successfully re-engage in the learning process. Participants will take part in two hands-on activities designed to highlight the importance of clear instructions, diverse learning experiences and needs, and psychological safety. Faculty will leave with practical strategies they can immediately adapt to classrooms, labs, clinics, shops, and other learning environments to foster engagement, confidence, and success for all learners. Note: To engage authentically in this session, please bring a device with you (e.g., laptop, tablet, phone, etc.) 2️⃣ Build Your AI: Creating a Copilot Agent That Works Like You with Corey Gill What if you could stop explaining yourself to AI every time you start a new conversation? In this hands-on session, participants will learn how to create a Microsoft Copilot Agent that reflects their communication style, teaching philosophy, and professional expertise. Rather than relying on generic AI tools, attendees will build the first version of a reusable AI assistant that can support tasks such as emails, announcements, student feedback, lesson planning, activity design, assessment development, and more. Participants will leave the session with: A working Copilot Agent customized to their needs A framework for refining and expanding their agent over time Practical examples of how agents can support teaching, communication, course design, and productivity This session also serves as the launch point for a broader AI Empowerment series focused on helping faculty build and evolve their own AI ecosystem. Future sessions will explore creating student-facing course agents, AI-supported course preparation, in-class activity generation, assessment and feedback assistants, teaching insight agents, and course outline development agents aligned with CTL best practices. Whether you are new to AI or already experimenting with Copilot, this session will help you move beyond prompting and begin building an AI assistant that works the way you do. 3️⃣ The Four C's of Constructive Feedback with Stephen Forbes Make difficult feedback easier to hear—and easier to act on—with Confirm, Connect, Compliment, Correct. In this hands-on session, practise giving honest, constructive feedback that supports learning in class and in one-to-one conversations. 11:50 a.m. Break Come get some coffee and check out our SoTL posters in the Global Classroom 12 NOON 🌎 Poster Sessions Come learn about the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) projects completed by faculty! Should Faculty Use Emojis with Students? with Dr. Lynne Kennette and Amanda Cappon The use of Emojis, or pictographs that represent various objects are used ubiquitously in digital communication yet are traditionally used sparingly in formal settings (see Huang et al., 2008; Huffaker & Calvert, 2005). Despite their widespread usage in the digital landscape, the scarce extant literature on Emoji usage in organizational (business, professional, academic) settings provides conflicting guidance on their usage, as Emojis in professional communication may be considered riskier (Rathgeber, 2024), especially when between individuals fulfilling different (hierarchical) roles (Lebovits, 2015). The present study is a small part of a larger study investigating student perceptions/evaluations of the impact of emoji usage in academic communications, specifically emails and assignment feedback, in both a qualitative and quantitative mixed method experimental design. Overall, students reported positive perceptions of faculty’s emoji use, including rapport and aspects of engagement, and perceptions of both the message and the sender/professor. Applications to practice will be shared with poster attendees. Including professor videos in online GNED courses has a positive impact on students’ experiences with Dr. Lynne Kennette and Ruth Rodgers In the classroom, teachers can build some connections with their students organically, simply by virtue of being in the same space at the same time. In a fully online classroom, teachers may need to be more intentional and active in planning these connections. In the present study, a professor added videos of herself introducing students to each unit’s content in the hopes of helping to build those connections with students. Responses to an anonymous survey about these videos showed that online learners had positive feelings towards their inclusion, particularly as it relates to their perception of the instructor (e.g., feeling that they knew the professor better, made them feel welcomed and the professor present and accessible, and that students would feel comfortable contacting the professor with questions about the course). Overall, feedback was quite positive. Implications for teaching practice will be shared along with analyses, including a connection to UDL and the importance of relationships in learning. College Student Success & Retention Strategies with Nathan Wilson, Claire McCormack, Angie Wood, Amy Derdall, and David Swerdfeger Our study investigated how cohort-building initiatives, engagement activities, and student support strategies influence persistence and success in our two-semester General Arts & Science program. Addressing a gap in Canadian college research, our study explored factors that shape student engagement, motivation, retention, and graduation. Our early findings can help to further identify evidence-based practices that strengthen belonging, support student success, and improve retention outcomes. Can cross-curricular projects about medical disparities influence empathy in Pre-Health Sciences students? with Karen Founk and Jesse Parsons The Pre-Health Sciences program created a cross-curricular project that aims to teach students about medical disparities through an interdisciplinary lens across multiple subjects. This study explored whether the cross-curricular project affected student empathy. The data collected now informs evidence-based best practices for empathy-forward pedagogy and works to deepen DC's commitment to close gaps in health. Practical Programming Tests: Stress vs. Authenticity with Kyle Chapman, Samson Chung, and Kenneth Hodgson We did a SoTL project on a practical programming test approach that we recognized could stress out the students. We wanted to find out how the benefits of the testing method can be balanced against the perceived negatives. Building VR/AR Learning In-House: Further Interim Findings from the MAD Paramedic Study with Vlad Chiriac and Edin Ibric The MAD Paramedic Study is an REB-approved Scholarship of Teaching and Learning initiative that brings together the Paramedic Program and the Faculty of Media, Art and Design to develop an in-house VR/AR patient-learning experience. So far, the project has involved Paramedic students interacting with a written patient case while Media, Art and Design Work-Study students design and develop its immersive counterpart. Building on an earlier project presentation, this poster shares further interim findings related to Paramedic-student learning, Work-Study participation, interprofessional collaboration and the practical development of immersive learning resources. The project offers emerging insight into both the educational value and implementation realities of creating a reusable, fiscally responsible, Made at Durham College model for VR/AR learning. 12:30 p.m. Strategic Plan pop-up Help inform our new Strategic Plan and shape the future of Durham College! Stop by our pop-up for a quick chat and to share your thoughts. 🌎 Lunch, Poster Presentations & Giveaways 1️⃣ Online testing: How much time do students use? with Dawn McGukin and Dr. Lynne N. Kennette Multiple choice tests are unlikely to disappear from formal education, partly due to their ease of large-scale administration, grading, and similarity to licensing exams in various fields (e.g., nursing). Despite post-secondary instructors’ best intentions in giving students adequate time to complete multiple choice assessments, it can be difficult to judge the amount of time that is actually required by students, while attempting to maintain test integrity and minimize cheating behaviour. This study examined students actual test-taking behaviour to determine how much time students used per multiple choice question and whether differences exist in the time used on two types of assessments: small quizzes with unlimited attempts, and unit tests with only one attempt. These results can help to guide pedagogical decisions (e.g., universal design) but it is also important to consider learner-specific characteristics which might affect how much time they use (or need) to complete multiple choice assessments. 2️⃣ Generative AI in Post-Secondary Education: Comparing Student and Faculty Use, Perceptions, and Technology Readiness with Dr. Erin Dancey, Howard Umrah, and Corey Gill This session shares findings from a mixed methods study on the use of Generative AI by Durham College students and faculty. Key takeaways include evidence-based strategies for integrating GenAI into teaching and insights into ethical concerns and program-specific attitudes. 3️⃣ Empowering Student Success: Leveraging AI and UDL to Redesign Assessments for Impact with Corey Gill This Poster Presentation shares a transformative approach to assessment design in first-year business education, grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and the integration of Generative AI tools. 4️⃣ Closing the Feedback Loop: Automated Assessment for Coding Education with Kyle Chapman In Introduction to Programming in 2023 and 2024, we piloted a tool designed to provide additional exercises and automated grading and feedback related to Python Programming. While the tool was effective and interesting to make use of, we were unable to correlate it with improved retention or positive student experiences. Perhaps the real interest comes from the unusual set of barriers to implementation and data collection, including lockdown, schedules, staffing changes, and the advent of public access to generative AI! 5️⃣ Academic Integrity Module for Students with Morgan Chapman A new DC Connect module supporting student Academic Integrity has been created. Come by to see it and learn how to add it into your course. 1️⃣ Self-reported preferences of flexible deadlines by Durham College students with Michelle Rivers and Dr. Lynne N. Kennette 2️⃣ Quantifying learning over time in a COMM course with Catherine Patterson, Christine Conacher, and Dr. Lynne N. Kennette 3️⃣ Testing online vs. in person: Does it affect test scores? with Amanda Cappon and Dr. Lynne N. Kennette 4️⃣ Is there a role for AI in durable skills development: An investigation of student perceptions with Morgan Chapman, Dr. Lynne N. Kennette, Clayton Rhodes, Nathan Wilson, and Alanna Szewczyk 5️⃣ Nutrition Education’s Impact on Student Wellness and Nutrition Literacy at Durham College with Erin Dancey and Sylvia Emmorey Join us for Fall Academic PD Day Hurry! Registration closes Tuesday, October 27, 2026. Register now